The May 4th 2009 edition of the Nation includes an article by Jeff Chang titled “The Creative Stimulus” (http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090504/chang) which gives voice to the power of creative expression in a way I rarely see. He talks about art as a way to not only restore human dignity, but in doing so, becoming an economic engine much different that the economics of art we have seen so far in our history.
“Culture is not just something conservatives wage war on,” Chang says. “The arts are not just something liberals dress up for on weekends. Creativity can be a powerful form of organizing communities from the bottom up.”
In the Brush Fire framework, we say that personal expression is a vitally important for a whole life. It is the generator of the ideas that create change and the power to manifest those ideas in life. This is crucial work for all communities in all times, but especially communities where access to power is limited.
Speaking of two arts-based communities in Oakland, Chang says, “Their communities are the most vulnerable to assaults on creativity, but they are also incubators of the most innovative ideas and movements of our time. This ‘creative communities’ approach has created a vigorous and vital alternative to neoliberal and neoconservative versions of change.”
From Brush Fire’s perspective, the alternative to all recognized versions of change comes from following the true creative impulse. When we are truly creative, we are not imitating anything that’s come before so solutions to problems are not only novel, but they resonate with the deepest parts of us. That resonance creates a lasting change as we live our way into the answers. That way, we can be free of corporate influences and the creation of “lifestyle economies” and concentrate instead on change that sustains and enriches communities.
Can we really create a new economy based on creativity-fueled change? I’m not sure if the global mind shift that would be required of us is possible. What do you think?









